|
|||||||
|
Welcome to the largest Windshield Repair Forum in the world. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
I guess I'm missing the point here.
GRT managed for whatever reason to back down the network's requirements concerning "additional insured" and that is what I gathered from his post. In consequence, he is talking about the difference between paying o/a $800 per year and o/a $250 the latter being a hell of a lot more realistic and reasonable considering the extent of our potential liability. RLI is one of the few insurance companies who recognize the difference between repair liability and replacement liability and as far as I'm concerned, we need to find more agents such as his who are willing to stand up and insist the difference exists. To bend over and meekly comply because the difference is one job per month or might aggravate a network isn't the way to protect our business in the long run. Sorry, Dave. I need to disagree with you on this point. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim,
Don't worry about it buddy. We can dissagree from time to time, there are other reasons for myself not using RLI but I am not going to list them here. Would take to long. David Coitster
__________________
Glass….. The Finale Frontier, These are the adventure of the glass guy named Coitster, his continuing mission, To explore strange new chips, to seek out new technicians and more sales, To Boldly Go Where No Chip Guy Has Gone Before |