what kind of results should i expect from ws repair?
Posted: August 3rd, 2006, 12:33 am
let me start by telling everyone a little about myself..
i am looking into getting into ws repair..
i was looking at the delta kits.. the dingking(simular to GT)..
and whatever else i could find on ebay/google..
i went down to dingking and saw a few bullseyes getting worked on.
first off, they used a steel marble that had a rubber band through
it to do the impact. the impact was about quarter-sized or so.
there was definatly fine cracks/web cracks all over the impact point.
the demonstration used the dingking kit which is simular to the GT one.
they used the air vacum method(i guess). the job was done pretty
close to the GT glass dvd i've watched.
but the results really bothered my friend and I. the crack/bullseye was
indeed filled, but you can see the little cracks all over the impact.
you can also see where the pit filled area was(which was what i thought).
we went in there expecting a near perfect cosmetic fix but instead, we walked out of there being told it was a structural fix, not a cosmetic.
i started looking more and more at different websites and sources and they all keep saying it WILL leave a blemish. is that true?
how do customers take it? like to me, its almost like selling a 50% fix for a product.. the best it can be is that itll look ugly but it won't spread..
i personally would not of accepted that quality work as being "ok". in fact, after seeing the demo, it scared me away from starting right away.
for example: lets say mary comes to me with a classic bullseye and she says: "i need this chip fixed because it bothers me and it looks ugly"
i reply: "oh well i can make it so it won't continue to spread and i can improve the visibility, but its not 100%"
mary: "what do you mean not 100%?? how will it look?"
me: "well the windshield repair industry only pretty much gives u a 50~90% cosmetic fix at maximum. it is only to prevent cracking"
mary: "well how bad will it look?"
me: "we'll it'll be better, how much? i'm not sure, hopefully we can get it to be at least 70% clearer and 100% safer"
mary: "well i dunno if i wanna pay to get something fixed just to be 70%"
i think after asking many people, they all agree that when they think of WS repair, they think of near perfect work where you can barely see the damaged area once it's done. maybe everyone's wrong.. but what is the reality of it? so will people all think that im giving a disclaimer because i suck at what i do?
i sure hope your guys can help me out. i want to get started but i'm just scared.
i am looking into getting into ws repair..
i was looking at the delta kits.. the dingking(simular to GT)..
and whatever else i could find on ebay/google..
i went down to dingking and saw a few bullseyes getting worked on.
first off, they used a steel marble that had a rubber band through
it to do the impact. the impact was about quarter-sized or so.
there was definatly fine cracks/web cracks all over the impact point.
the demonstration used the dingking kit which is simular to the GT one.
they used the air vacum method(i guess). the job was done pretty
close to the GT glass dvd i've watched.
but the results really bothered my friend and I. the crack/bullseye was
indeed filled, but you can see the little cracks all over the impact.
you can also see where the pit filled area was(which was what i thought).
we went in there expecting a near perfect cosmetic fix but instead, we walked out of there being told it was a structural fix, not a cosmetic.
i started looking more and more at different websites and sources and they all keep saying it WILL leave a blemish. is that true?
how do customers take it? like to me, its almost like selling a 50% fix for a product.. the best it can be is that itll look ugly but it won't spread..
i personally would not of accepted that quality work as being "ok". in fact, after seeing the demo, it scared me away from starting right away.
for example: lets say mary comes to me with a classic bullseye and she says: "i need this chip fixed because it bothers me and it looks ugly"
i reply: "oh well i can make it so it won't continue to spread and i can improve the visibility, but its not 100%"
mary: "what do you mean not 100%?? how will it look?"
me: "well the windshield repair industry only pretty much gives u a 50~90% cosmetic fix at maximum. it is only to prevent cracking"
mary: "well how bad will it look?"
me: "we'll it'll be better, how much? i'm not sure, hopefully we can get it to be at least 70% clearer and 100% safer"
mary: "well i dunno if i wanna pay to get something fixed just to be 70%"
i think after asking many people, they all agree that when they think of WS repair, they think of near perfect work where you can barely see the damaged area once it's done. maybe everyone's wrong.. but what is the reality of it? so will people all think that im giving a disclaimer because i suck at what i do?
i sure hope your guys can help me out. i want to get started but i'm just scared.