You are correct, Jeff.
The original topic concerns the NWRA even though I don't understand why you wouldn't be eligible as a board member.
Honestly.
Delta isn't in the replacement business, nicht wahr?
You are also correct Repair! minus the assumption that the present networks existed BEFORE the NWRA.
Not to my recollection and I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure I'm not.
My contempt for insurance companies and their embracement of the present network system is connected to past failures of the NWRA to head off this present asinine situation at the pass in the first place.
But, let us keep the two topics separate for now even though i agree that they are inextricably intertwined.
And, excuse me, big Welshman.
It has nothing to do with money.
It has nothing to do with being "tight".
I think it has everything to do with the return on an investment.
Either the repair industry is full of a bunch of uniformed idiots who fail to recognize a good representative organization dedicated to our best interest or...
as I think...
a bunch of experienced techs who go back quite a few years who recognize that investing $150 bucks in the present organization would be better spent at the blackjack table in the nearest Indian casino.
More importantly, I second the motion of those who recognize the dangers that we face right now and who wish to address the problem right now with no further rhetoric.
You are the moderator, Jeff.
You are the person who suggests that we work within the present system.
Well.
I'm all for it.
Ready set and go.
Start a new post with suggestions as to what our industry needs and what we wish to attain.
Just watch your language or I'll need to censure you, Jeff.
